Des blagues oui mais des blagues drole (Suite)


#3221

:laughing: putain :laughing:


#3222

Une blague de jean-cul GODar


#3223

ohhhh putinnnnnn mdrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr


#3224

Jean-cul Grodard! :slight_smile:


#3225


#3226


#3227

Je viens de visualiser ton chien :laughing:


#3228

Mais j’adore mon p’tit toutou! :laughing:


#3229

C’est tout le problème :laughing:


#3230

Tout façon je ne risque rien, elle ne met pas les pieds sur le forum! :mrgreen:


#3231

dédicae Totor Tardy :astonished:


#3232

Une femme consulte son médecin pour l’apparition de taches vertes à l’intérieur des cuisses. Après l’avoir examiné, le toubib lui demande:

  • Votre ami ne serait pas gitan?
  • En effet docteur mais pourquoi cette question?
  • Vous lui direz pour ses boucles d’oreilles c’est pas de l’or mais du bronze

#3233

:laughing:


#3234

on peut sla rpasser un coup celle-là, elle est fatale. :laughing:


#3235

If, according to Kanye West, one good girl is worth a thousand bitches, and if, according to Lil Wayne, bitches come a dime a dozen, does that mean one good girl is worth $8.33?
Well, $8.35 in Canada.
In Thailand, $8.33 is about 275 Baht. 275 Baht will get you a skanky hooker in a Thai brothel. If you want a really good hooker, it’ll cost you at least 2000 Baht, or about $61.00. So in Thailand a good woman is worth $61.00 or $732 a dozen.
Yes. However to further this, according to 2Pac Mo’ Money= Mo’ Bitches If you divide out Mo’, you will see that money=bitches Therefore, 1000 moneys= one good girl.
To extrapolate further, diving with respect to “money” yields 1 money = $0.00833 This changes everything, because money isn’t worth hardly anything.
True. A linear relationship between money and bitches means the equation relating money to bitches is in the form of y=ax+b, where x is money and y is bitches. Consulting the Lil Wayne theorem, if 12 bitches is worth $0.10, then one bitch is $0.0083. Therefore we know that the equation 1=a(.0083)+b must hold true and so must 12=a(.1)+b. To find the equation relating money to bitches must have “a” and “b” values which satisfy the two previous equations. Since “Mo’” implies a positive linear relation, we know “a” must be positive. I have done the math for you and found that a=119.96 and b=.0043. So, (Bitches)=119.96(Money) + .0043. To find the number of good girls you get from an amount of money, simply divide the number of bitches by 1000 (because of the Kanye West Theorem).
No but biggie said mo’ money= mo’ problems so money=problems and since mo’ money mo’ bitches, we can see that bitches=problems
Well one must first consult the “50 Cent Law”: “Mo’ Money, Mo’ Problems”. Here we see that the amount of money is proportionate to the number of problems. Then one must factor one of the basic rules of the “The Carter Theorem” : “I got 99 problem but a bitch ain’t one”. Here we see that without a “bitch” the average person will have exactly 99 problems. Therefore the formula must be applied: (current amount of money) (8.33) / ln[(Problems100-1 ) * (current amount of money)]bitches = worth of bitch Unfortunately this formula only tells us the value “a bitch” which as we know is only worth one monies Therefore you must apply [(worth of bitch) * (problems) * (money-8.33)] + 1 / 1000 = The value of a good girl Hope this helps
Yeah. No. That’s not how math works. 2pac was merely stating that the derivative of Money in terms of Bitches is strictly positive. More-over, he skipped a lot of steps in his proof and never formally published the full version. I bet you believed Fermat’s margins really were too small as well, right?
Imperial bitches is actually a unit of weight. An imperial bitch is ~111.1111111112 pounds.
Theres one fundamental law of math that Lil’Wayne forgot to include in his calculations. We have to follow the law of “bitches ain’t shit” theorized by doctor dre himself. With that principal included we can work out that if bitches aint shit, and a good girl is worth 1,000 bitches, a good girl is still not worth shit.
You’re forgetting that Jay-Z published his paper on the “Money Ain’t A Thang” theory. Therefore if bitches aren’t worth shit then bitches aren’t money and so therefore they ARE, in fact, a “Thang”.
Is that the transitive property of bitches? Is it possible that for every bitch, there is an equal and opposite good girl? That doesn’t make sense though because kanye said a good girl is worth one thousand bitches. The economics don’t make sense. Newton or kanye is wrong. They cannot both apply their laws to bitches
I think the important part here is, are we assuming that there is 1 good girl for every 1000 bitches. This is a very scary thought. 1/1000 females is a good girl and the other 999 are bitches. To me this would make my $8.33 a very good investment. I paid at least $3000 for my wife’s wedding ring. Could I have bought 360 good girls in stead of 1 good girl? B/c I can’t help but feel like I have overpaid for my good girl according to the genius of Kanye West and Little Weezy F. Baby. Don’t get me wrong, I love my good girl wife, but I feel duped knowing she may have only been worth 8 bucks instead of 3000
It actually depends on they type of women. If it is a bakers daughter it is less since the sample size is actually larger I.E. a bakers dozen (13) so: (.10/13)x1000=$7.69 …0r $9.69 Canadian (not counting the maple syrup)
How much candy you can buy for $8.33?
We can conclude that 1 bitch is worth approximately 0.83c, but since bitches are of negative value it’s actually -0.83c. This means that in order to get the correct positive value of a good girl there needs to be an exponential factor involved here. In order to evaluate the amount of good girls needed to offset the bitches you use the simple formula -0.0083B2 = G. This intuitively makes sense when you think about how the more bitches you have around you the exponentially higher value even a single good girl has. So when B=1000 we get: G = -0.0083(1000)2 = $68.89 Interestingly enough, if the entire female population of the US, let’s say 150 million for simplicity, were bitches, the worth of one good girl would then be $1,550,025,000,000 which is just over the total USD currently in circulation.


#3236

Il a oublié le théorème de Kendrick L’étang selon lequel : “Bitch, don’t kill my vibe”.
Ce qui veut dire que les “femmes bien” niquent forcément l’ambiance donc t’as beau mettre $1,550,025,000,000 ta soirée sera quand même pourrie.
Donc tout ça pour prouver que $1,550,025,000,000, ça vaut en fait rien. Donc money = nothing, ce qui avait déjà été expliqué à l’époque par la théorie souvent réfutée des Dire Straits selon laquelle : “Money for Nothing”.
On voit donc bien qu’il aurait fallu écouter les Dire Straits à l’époque, ils avaient déjà raison.


#3237

oui enfin votre approche est caduque depuis que les deux theoriciens bruboss et baloo, par leur théoreme “il en faut peut pour etre heureux, il faut savoir se satisfaire du necessaire”, prouve qu’une passe à 50 € dans une rue sombre est plus pertinente que toutes les soirées dasn un harem (sans prendre en compte le cout du foncier d’un tel harem)


#3238

Trois oiseaux sont sur une branche,un chasseur en tue un, combien il en reste ?
Aucun dit un élève : avec le coup de feu les autres oiseaux s’envolent donc y en à plus!
La maitresse répond : c’est pas faux, je m’attendais pas à ça, j’aime bien ta façon de penser.
L’élève demande si 3 femmes mangent une glace, une croque, l’autre lèche, la dernière suce laquelle est mariée?
La maitresse gênée répond : euh la dernière peut-être …
L’élève répond : non, celle qui à une alliance mais j’aime bien votre façon de penser.

désolé


#3239

apparement sa y est t’as vraiment divorcé avec totor :laughing:


#3240

C’est Samuel qui va voir le rabbin:
"- Rabbin, rabbin, j’aimerais que vous circoncisiez mon chien.

  • Mon cher Samuel, on ne circoncit pas les chiens voyons!
  • S’il vous plait rabbin, je vous payerai. 10 000 euros!
  • Non Samuel, je regrette mais ce n’est pas possible.
  • Allez, 30 000 euros et vous circoncisez mon dobermann.
  • Dobermann, doberbmann… C’est juif ça?"